Ed Garren: Elsie, Tara & The Whole Circus
I recently received my WeHoNews.com in my E mail with an interview with
the resigning head of the West Hollywood Community Housing Corporation
about the proposed Laurel Place development, "Tara.” In it Paul
Zimmerman says about Elsie Weisman’s chosen name for the property
“’Tara’ was a slave plantation in the south and that carries all sorts
of negative implications for me." I
heard the same comment one day about two years ago on the sidewalk in
front of "Tara." I was having a brief conversation with a noted
journalist from our community. I have always respected her insights,
writing ability, and ability to analyze situations. But her comments
about Elsie's name for the place were the same, a slave plantation, how
awful, etc. None of this stuff is easy. But it hails back to the
comments in my column last week about how Angelenos appear to deal with
race and racism. If we simply erase any references to the topic, then
it will go away. This seems to be the current way of erasing
Elsie's name for the place. For the record, "Tara" only existed in
Margaret Mitchell's highly romanticized novel. There was no actual
place, except on the back lot of MGM in Culver City. So I guess there
was a "Tara" in the south, south of West Hollywood. The
institution of slavery in America hits quite close to my own personal
history. I don't know about Mr. Zimmerman, or my journalist
acquaintance, but my mother's family is from Georgia. The family
patriarch won a land grant for fighting in the revolutionary war and
settled the rich hills of north Georgia. As a part of working the land,
they owned slaves. The place wasn't exactly the "Tara" of Margaret
Mitchell fame, more like the small farm upon which Kizzie in "Roots"
spent most of her life. After the Civil War, it was more like "Cold
Mountain" than anything else. The family lost the property to
Carpetbaggers and fell to share cropping. As
a Family Therapist, we explore history, very deep personal history.
Personal history is always multi-generational. It is impossible to
separate ones past from the present. The experiences of our family all
add up to who and what we are today. Part of the healing process is to
be integrated with that past, and to have made peace with it. To
cut off that past, to censor it out of existence doesn't make much
sense. Not a moment goes by in my waking hours that I am not reminded
of both sides of my family's past, and it's a good thing. I never take
for granted my privilege as a white male, or all that privilege has
granted me and my ancestors. I have vivid memories of my mother's
sister, aunt Velma, showing me the graves of two young boys, who great
(double in my case) grandfather bought from a cruel owner. The boys,
who had some sort of physical handicap, had been deemed unfit for work,
so the owner stopped feeding them. Our ancestor bought the two boys,
and took them home. Both were so hungry that one ate too much and died
at the table, the other had to be pulled away from the food before he
suffered the same fate. With tears in her eyes, she talked about human
cruelty, the injustices of slavery, but more importantly the injustices
of greed. Memories like that keep me centered. They are a simple fact
of life that remind me of my relationship with God and humanity. Being
reminded of slavery is a good thing because it is part of our past, the
very dark and ugly side of it that relates to the dark side of human
nature, including exploitation and greed. Greed is the child of fear,
and there seems to be an epidemic of both in America today, including
West Hollywood. I look around at all the folks who think it's better to erase history, erase the past, rather than learn from it. So,
in spite of Elsie Weisman's use of the name "Tara" to describe her
beloved manor house on the hill, and in spite of her gift of it to the
city, not only do the powers that be wish to erase her name for the
property, but they also wish to erase her name as well. If "Tara" was
so disconcerting, why not "Weisman Place" for the property? It's the
least they could do. And let's talk of erasing the past. Let's
start with a more recent event than slavery in America, the Holocaust.
My Jewish grandfather fled pre WWI Europe with his new gentile bride
because he saw the mess that was coming. But to all those who stayed
behind, we know what happened to most of them. Lest anyone forget, the
machinery of the third Reich which so efficiently destroyed six million
Jews was made by Mercedes Benz, BMW, Audi, Krups, Bosch, the mainstays
of German technology. The records were kept on IBM punch cards. So
I find it puzzling to see persons of Jewish descent, who on one hand
want to remember the Holocaust, but on the other hand have no problem
driving BMWs, Mercedes, Audi, Porsche, making coffee in a Krups or
Bosch coffee maker. They seem to easily separate these things from the
deaths of our ancestors in one of the most horrific genocide's in
history. I'm not trying to make an indictment here, just a point.
We all do it, we are all tied to some sort of atrocity or degradation.
Martin Luther King said it best, "none of us have clean hands." But
the politically correct sentiment in West Hollywood has decided that
the word "Tara" is not appropriate for use in conversation or
reference. Given the city's inability to honor it's own founders, I
suspect that the place will barely remember Elsie, without any
reference to her beloved "Tara", or the rancho's heritage. I
guess this is the same selective mentality that makes it easy to own
those implements made by the makers of the Holocaust, even if one had
family members who were lost in it. I don't know if Mr. Zimmerman is
Jewish, but I'm sure he has friends who are. Does he drive a German
car? Does he remember the holocaust when he operates it? And if his car
is not German, perhaps it's Japanese. Does he consider the atrocities
of the Japanese against the Chinese, Philippinos and Koreans when he
starts up his auto in the morning? Has he forgotten the rape of Nan
Ging, the comfort women, etc? And if he's able to make all this okay in
his mind, why the disdain for the word "Tara" (which means earth)? Again,
I'm not trying to make an indictment of either the Germans or the
Japanese here, just pointing out some selective memory going on in the
minds of so called "politically correct" people. Why is Elsie's name
for the place, "Tara", so offensive if all of these other things are
okay? And
to the owners of all of the imported cars in L.A., how politically
correct is it to buy a product that puts American workers out of good
paying jobs, the few that are left in this country? Jeff Prang pointed
that out in one of his letters a few months ago. Democrats in Detroit
don't buy foreign cars. So what makes it okay in LA? Why "Made in
U.S.A." so offensive to these people? Particularly when so many really
good products are being made here now. None of this stuff is
simple, but as always in Los Angeles, fashion dictates what is okay and
what is not. It's fashionable to buy imported products, it's
fashionable to bash people from "red" states, particularly if they have
a drawl. So "Tara" is out, but buying Krups is in. Even if Krups made
the machinery that made places like Auschwitz so efficient. Does the word hypocrisy come to mind, or is it just thoughtlessness? From
all accounts, the city prohibited the Weisman family from developing
the property, which encouraged Elsie into giving it to the city. She
had no idea that her "cultural resource" would be turned into a housing
project, destroying her beloved property, trees ripped out, animals
displaced, house gutted, and a huge stucco monolith built around it. Everyone
has an Elsie anecdote, but I've maintained all along that if anyone
knew her wishes it was her family and her neighbors on the property,
all of whom have said the proposed "Laurel Place" project is an
abomination and a farce. Why else would her family and close friends
spend thousands of dollars to try to stop the proposed development? A
housing project which destroys the property's historic integrity,
destroys the very elements which brought about the Cultural Resource
designation in the first place. And now, this flap about "Tara"
and it's reference to slavery. I don't think that's the issue at all. I
think the real issue is that these people know they are cheating
Elsie's intent, they know that their plans are going to ruin the place,
that they violate her intent and wishes for the property. So in their
guilt and shame they wish to erase any and all elements of Elsie, her
life, her beloved "Tara" and her memory. That's why they won't use "Tara" and they didn't think of honoring her by naming the project Weisman Place.
********************** Edward
"Ed" Garren, MFT is a Family Therapist, justice activist, former West
Hollywood City Council candidate, writer and sojourner. He is
originally from the Tampa Bay area of central Florida. Ed has been
published in the Los Angeles Times, Frontiers news magazine, and other
books, including "Out of My Mind,” a pictorial memoir by Kris Nelson.
He is currently working on a book about Addiction in America. Ed Garren can be reached, even in the Red America’s wilds, at 
Ed Garren. By Ryan Gierach. 
A view of the side of Tara slated for development. By Ryan Gierach. 
The Elsie Weisman Estate at 1343 N Laurel, which she called Tara for decades. By Ryan Gierach. 
Ed in the Old South – North Carolina. By Ed Garren.