The Journey: The Despot
A
friend told me I could watch the Tara hearing on the city's streaming
video page at the web site. I watched it, agonizing as it was. It
conjured up a lot of old memories, and a few patterns became very clear. Long
ago and far away, I once owned a home of Vista Street across from
Plummer Park. When I bought the house, I had been living in West
Hollywood adjacent, a half a block out of the creative city, on Alfred
Street. I was excited about returning to being a West Hollywood
resident after almost ten years of living near, but not in West
Hollywood. I helped form a neighborhood watch with a neighbor. I
single handedly chased away the young drug dealers who congregated in
front of my house every night, made improvements to my home, held
"National Night Out" barbecues in my front yard and was part of the
formation of the new East Side Redevelopment Project Area Committee
(PAC). As
years went on, it became obvious that the aging felt shingles on my
roof needed replacing. I looked at the houses of neighbors who had put
on new roofs, and found their white asphalt shingles already starting
to crack with age after only a couple of years. I calculated the weight
on the roof of just one layer of shingles, about 3,000 pounds, plus
additional weight of plywood sheathing on top of the existing roof
boards another 2,000 pounds. After a lot of consideration, I just could
not justify putting 5 or 6 thousand pounds of weight on my roof.
Particularly weight that was not fireproof. I
grew up in a home in Florida similar to the home of Vista Street. It
had a standing seam "Five V" metal roof. That roof lasted for decades,
and I loved the sound of rain on it, a muffled whisper that sounds like
wind through pine leaves. After some research, I decided to put a
similar roof on my house in West Hollywood. I went to the planning
department, filled with naive optimism, and presented my idea. The roof
would be fireproof, light weight (less than 2,000 pounds) and would
last up to 80 years. Made from recycled steel, it could also be
recycled when the roof or the house was replaced. It seemed the perfect
progressive "green" solution. That was the beginning of a several
months long battle because the planning department leadership insisted
the metal roof was "not appropriate" for my house. One of the
things I did was an eMail campaign regarding my ongoing struggle to
simply be heard on the issue. During that time, I spoke with all
councilmembers about the issue except John Heilman's office, which did
not respond to any of my queries. Steve Martin, Sal Guariello and Jeff
Prang all basically said "They don't listen to anyone, including me,
good luck." John Duran basically said, "I don't know what you expect me
to do about it." I found this disturbing and told all of them that I
thought the role of elected leadership was to circumvent inflexible
bureaucracies on behalf of constituents. I
ran into John Heilman at a candidates’ forum in Plummer Park. He was
running for re-election. I asked him why he and his office had been
silent regarding the issue. His response was, "Well, I happen to agree
with the planning department, I don't think that sort of roof is
appropriate for a house in West Hollywood." I told him the performance
features of the roof (as stated above) and that there was no other
roofing option that offered those features. He then told me, "I think
there are other options that you haven't researched." I
was struck by this, and thought to myself, "John, when did you become
an architect and a roofer?" Instead, I politely replied, "John, I've
researched this a lot, this is the best roof for my house." He replied,
"Well, I don't agree with you" and then excused himself. I went
home and things slowly started unfolding in front of me. Out of the fog
of city bureaucracy, a clear picture began to emerge. The roof
saga was finally resolved when Donald DeLuccio, Jeff Prang's appointee
to the Planning Commission, told me I should take the issue directly to
the Planning Commission for consideration. I did, and they gave me a
unanimous approval. The director of Planning who had been so difficult
was released from city employment shortly after. That is the
power of due process, but it no longer exists in the city. Later after
Steve Martin was defeated by Abbe, I had lunch with an old friend (not
Steve Martin) who had once been an elected officeholder in West
Hollywood years ago. I shared my concerns with my friend who looked at
me across the table and stated flatly, "John has always wanted to run
the city. Now that he's gotten rid of Steve, he will have free reign
over the city, it's his now." Watching
the City Council hearing on Tara was like watching a carefully staged
execution. What has died in West Hollywood is meaningful due process,
and respect for dissent. It has been replaced by a despot and his
allies, who allow no one to disagree with them. I listened with
interest as John Duran defended himself, and the city's decision. Abbe
and John Heilman waxed poetic about affordable housing. John
added his lengthy comments about the moral imperative of creating
affordable housing at any cost. I almost threw up. I wanted to scream
through my computer screen, "THEN WHY DIDN'T YOU BUILD 80 UNITS ON THE
(former) PHONE COMPANY PROPERTY (Hancock and Santa Monica) THAT YOU
SOLD AT LESS THAN MARKET VALUE SO YOUR "FRIENDS" COULD BUILT PRIVATE
MARKET RATE CONDOS ON IT?" If he really wants affordable
housing, why doesn’'t he try to buy some of the empty buildings that
have been vacated due to the Ellis Act and convert them to affordable
housing in the city. Now that construction financing for new
developments is at a standstill (they can't sell the existing
projects), soon many of these buildings will be on the auction block.
Is that too creative a possibility for the Creative City? If a
whole building is too much, then the city could buy up repossessed and
unsold condos to be used as affordable housing as well. These will be
hitting the market in about two years, the city should prepare now. If
continuing to insist on pursuing the development of Tara in the face of
such massive opposition from residents is really about a "moral
imperative" then why not at least honor Elsie’s gift by naming the new
project "Elsie Weisman Place" to permanently honor her gift to the
city? John
Duran spoke of the Weismans not using the many opportunities to put
restrictions on the gift of the property to the city. John Heilman went
on to basically say that if Elsie had put any restrictions on the use
of the property, he would have voted to not accept the gift of it to
the city. He also implied that if the gift had any use restrictions,
then the family might not get any tax breaks from the gift. So
just like everything else that comes out of these three, it's what is
"between the lines" (or perhaps between the lies) that completes the
story. Below is my belief of what happened. When I say "the city"
please read "the Empire" (lead by John Heilman) because that's whose
agenda is being pushed. The city blackmailed the Weismans with
the "Cultural Resource" designation, preventing any development by the
Weismans on the property. Because of the "Cultural Resource"
designation, she and her family could not make any developments or
improvements on the property, and anyone they tried to sell it to would
have the same restrictions. The city's declaration made the property
worthless to all, except the city. Then,
when Elsie decided to gift the property to the city, she and her family
were further "boxed in" by a dialogue or negotiation process in which
they might have been told that the could not place any restrictions on
the use of the property by the city. With a "one/two sucker punch" the
city then probably made it clear in the negotiations, "no restrictions"
or we won't take it. Left
with no other options, and with only hope that the city would in fact
preserve the property and use it as some sort of "Heritage Center", she
accepted that she was powerless to do anything else, and made the best
of the situation. Once the city received the property, and
Elsie passed into the next life, John Heilman quietly laid his plans,
and with no public hearings, no community input or any other due
process, made a unilateral decision to develop the property. From
all of his comments, not just about Tara, but over many years, this is
a man who only considers the house to have value, not the trees or the
animals that live in them. It is the largest animal habitat in the
city, but that is on no consequence to the Empire. What he, and
his supporters don't seem to understand (or do understand but don't
care) is that it is NOT a senior housing project that has enraged this
community. John Heilman has ignored due process, creating a
sham of the existing democratic structures by stacking all of them with
people who will do his bidding, either from favoritism or fear. He has
extinguished dissent on all of the commissions and advisory boards, and
railroaded his personal agenda, cloaked as a "moral imperative" upon
the residents of the city. This is no different that how Bush and Cheney got us into the war in Iraq. Tara
was given to the City of West Hollywood, not John Heilman. But he
appears to think that he is the city, with no regard to the rest of the
people in it that may disagree with him. No matter how well intended, a
despot is still a despot, and that is why ever increasing ranks of
residents in the city are fed up with how it is run, favors for the
Empire and it's friends, exclusion and punishment for everyone else. Those
who know the story are particularly enraged by what appears to be legal
extortion by the city with regard to acquiring the property from an
elderly woman and her heirs. If they can do it to Elsie, they can do it
to anyone. Now that they have moved the project forward, there
should be a community imperative to name the project "Elsie Weisman
Villas." It is the least they can do to honor her memory and her gift. I
will be very surprised if they do. They are so shame and guilt ridden
that they wish to erase any and all references to Elsie and her beloved
"Tara" because it reminds them of their actions. It's all a
show, filled with actors on a stage, acting like they care, when they
don't. And the worst part is that John Heilman, John Duran and Abbe
appear to believe their own public relations, which as everyone in
Hollywood knows, is the worst thing any actor can do. There are times when regular politics will not do, and this is one of those times. -- Molly Ivins Edward
"Ed" Garren, MFT is a Family Therapist, justice activist, former West
Hollywood City Council candidate, writer and sojourner. He
is originally from the Tampa Bay area of central Florida. Ed has been
published in the Los Angeles Times, Frontiers news magazine, and other
books, including "Out of My Mind", a pictorial memoir by Kris Nelson.
He is currently working on a book about Addiction in America. Ed Garren can be reached, even in hie North Western haunts, at 
Ed Garren. By Ryan Gierach. 
ADVERTISEMENT – please support our gracious community-based sponsors - ADVERTISEMENT 
West Hollywood Council member Sal Guarriello. By Ryan Gierach. 
Advertisement - Visit “The Other Side” on Friday Nights to hear James Lent - Advertisement 
Ed Garren at his B-B-que grill on a National Night Out. 
ADVERTISEMENT – please support our gracious community-based sponsors - ADVERTISEMENT 
Mayor John Heilman at his installation. By Ryan Gierach. 
ADVERTISEMENT – please support our gracious community-based sponsors - ADVERTISEMENT 
The estate given to the City “to preserve.” A 27-unit Senior housing unit will be built on the site. By Ryan Gierach.
ADVERTISEMENT – please support our gracious community-based sponsors - ADVERTISEMENT 
Council member Abbe Land. By Ryan Gierach. 
Council member John Duran. By Ryan Gierach. 

Advertise With WeHoNews - Reach 55,000 pairs of eyes each month while supporting WeHo’s ONLY COMMUNITY ONLINE NEWSPAPER