The Journey: Problem with “Growing Up
Last week, I made some time to read Tom Atwood's op-ed article entitled WeHo Should Grow “UP.” Mr.
Atwood made some good arguments, in fact I would agree with almost all
of them. But as a relatively recent transplant, he apparently is not
aware of one VERY important difference between New York and Los
Angeles. It's called geology. New York sits on very stable
igneous rock (fire formed) like granite. The few fault lines near New
York that may be active appear to have been dormant for centuries. In
simple terms, the ground is very hard rock and doesn't move on a
regular basis. Nothing could be more different in LA. Our famous
hills are sedimentary rock (NOT fire formed) like shale and sandstone.
They are sort of like sun dried adobe bricks (igneous being more like
kiln fired bricks). Get sedimentary rock very wet from too much rain
and it reverts to mud, which is famous for sliding. Then there is the
shaking factor. I'll lay odds that Mr. Atwood was not here for the
Northridge earthquake and has not lived through a major seismic event. When
I was a child, the documentaries I watched on life in Southern
California touted LA's low skyline, explaining that the reason that
City Hall was the tallest building was because of earthquakes, and the
impossibility of building tall buildings on shaky ground. That
all changed in the 1970's, when building advances developed by the
Japanese, promised seismically safe tall buildings. This technology did
not prove as reliable in Kobe as it had promised. Even here, after the
Northridge quake, thousands of buildings were seriously compromised
when it was discovered that they had seismic damage at key points where
they were riveted together. After our very tall downtown buildings were
built, a major fault was discovered directly under them, and there is
now some concern about their performance if the fault lets go. Growing
up in Florida, I became suspicious of any developer who did not know
and respect geology and other forces of nature. In the 1970's we had a
building boom in Tampa Florida, which is the thunder storm capital of
the planet. Unique to even other parts of the state, an afternoon
thunderstorm is a regular occurrence most afternoons from late May
through September. An inch of rain in 30 minutes is the usual event,
sometimes more. Several apartment complexes were built by
California based developers, as well as the "Floriland Mall" at Busch
Boulevard and Florida Avenue in north Tampa. Every time we had a heavy
rain, which in the summer was almost every night, these poorly drained
complexes turned into lakes. On evening, a friend called me in tears.
She had gone shopping at Floriland, and while inside, a storm had gone
through. When she walked out, her car was in three feet of water. The
Olds Cutlass parked over the only drain in the entire (dish shaped)
parking lot was in water over it's hood. The
apartment complexes did not fare much better. A friend lived in one of
them, and endured water lapping up to her front door almost every rain
storm. She had to park her car out of the complex during the summer, or
wade through a foot of water to get to it after it rained. But the
most glaring example was the housing development in south Miami,
"Kendall Walk." It was a community of upscale homes, built in an
intimate village setting, lushly landscaped, promising the finest of
Florida living. The California based developer somehow decided that the
usual California style of construction, chipboard and stucco, could
somehow meet the windstorm requirements of Dade County construction
codes. The building inspectors, who were bought off, apparently
agreed. When hurricane Andrew came through, the houses exploded like
card houses. Roofs flew off, exterior walls blew out like paper mache,
dozens of people were never found. They had taken refuge in their
homes, which failed, and they were carried away along with the debris
of their houses by the fierce winds. So ANY discussion of
development in Los Angeles, or West Hollywood should include serious
inclusion of the geological issues which lurk beneath the pavement,
grass and flowers. Mr.
Atwood wasn't here in 1984 when the Ross Dress for Less on Beverly,
just east of Fairfax exploded. I remember it vividly. It was the day
after a small earthquake, the first one I ever felt. I'd been in West
Hollywood about a year, and was sitting in my second floor apartment at
946 N. Curson one afternoon. A
loud "thud", sort of like someone slamming a big door downstairs,
echoed through the building. I puzzled over what it could be, till I
watched the evening news. It was a 2.1 quake, located near Fairfax and
Beverly. The next afternoon, an employee of the Ross store flipped on a
light switch in the store room and the entire building turned into a
fireball inside, blasting out the front windows, and seriously injuring
all of those inside. I can't remember if anyone died, but if
you drove by afterward, there were gas fires all over the parking lot
that burned for weeks. The earthquake had released a pocket of methane
which had migrated into the walls and ceiling of the Ross store (and
one of it's neighboring stores as well). If you go there now, you
will notice a small pumping machine in a wire cage, about half the size
of a Volkswagen, in one of the parking spaces, pumping methane out of
the ground. I'm
sure Mr. Atwood enjoys shopping at The Grove and has never noticed that
there are discrete methane detectors all over the complex, even some of
the restrooms in the stores have them. The original Farmers Market is
built the way it is, with it's charming booths and canvas awnings
partially due to the predominance of Methane in the area. It's open air
design allowed the methane to escape discreetly, avoiding accumulation
and ignition. Anything
close to the Tar Pits is basically floating on a large underground pool
of tar and methane. The oil was pumped out decades ago. Then
there is West Hollywood's "Gateway" center at La Brea and Santa Monica
Blvd. When the original developer, and good friend of John Heilman,
J.W. Snyder was planning the project, we of the Eastside PAC asked
about the water table, which is quite high in that part of the city.
The Snyder team assured us that they would be able to dig down three
levels for parking, to accommodate the shopping and office components
of the project. Well, they dug down two levels, and then hit
one of the largest aquifers in the region at about sixteen feel. They
put a legion of pumps into that hole trying to pump it dry enough to
dig the third level, all to no avail. Finally they came back to us to
tell us that with the difficulties of digging, tied to the falling
office market in the region, it would be unfeasible to put in the
office component. That's why the Gateway only has two floors of
parking, and I've been told that in heavy rains the lower floor can get
very damp. It's also interesting that after promising the PAC that they
would retain ownership of the complex after it was built, Snyder sold
the complex before it was full, retaining only management of it. The
same aquifer runs under most of the east side of West Hollywood, so I
wonder how they are going to build eleven floor buildings if the
foundation can only be dug two floors before they hit water. Can you
imagine the seismic nightmare of a ten story building swaying in a
major earthquake? Then consider it's foundation sitting in mud? Do you
believe such a building, filled with seniors and the disabled would be
a safe place to live? The city seems to think so. Most
of West Hollywood sits atop an underground aquifer that flows out of
the Santa Monica mountains and under the city. In the early days of the
city, a leaking gasoline tank up on Sunset migrated gasoline down this
underground river which ended up in the parking garages of a few
apartment buildings on Huntley Drive, just north of Melrose. This
is the same soil that Mr. Atwood and Mr. Duran want to put a subway
through? It is the same soil that City Council approved the
construction of four ten story buildings at La Cienega and Sunset on.
The serious questions about two fault lines, one inactive, one
questionable, were ignored by City Council. Even though about 100
residents came out to oppose the project, John Duran, Jeff Prang and
Sal approved it anyway (with John Heilman absent because he lives too
close to it). Mr. Atwood mentioned that he lived in San Francisco
for a while. I guess he didn't stay long enough to learn why most of
San Francisco is built "low." The reason the city never embraced high
rise building is the memory of the 1909 earthquake. Most San
Franciscans heard vivid stories from childhood about buildings
collapsing, people dying, the city erupting in flames. None of it would
encourage high rise living. I
also suspect Mr. Atwood may not know the meaning of the word Cienega.
It means swamp or marsh. Until the drainage systems were installed
south of Olympic in the 30's, much of that part of the city was always
soggy from all the water coming out of the hills. The
spring below Santa Monica blvd., in front of the house behind 24 Hr.
Fitness, that kept the gutters of Westmount wet all year round has been
capped off and drained into the sewer, but I suspect the one up in the
hills that did the same thing for Rising Glen and Sunset Plaza is still
in business. If you ever REALLY want to see an interesting
piece of information, go to the second floor of City Hall. Across from
the Planning Department desk there is a map of "Liquefaction Zones" for
the city of West Hollywood. Much of the city is in a liquefaction zone,
due to our very wet ground about ten to twenty feet below the surface.
Don't be surprised if it gets moved after this is published. So,
let me get this right. We're going to build ten floor buildings, with
two floor foundations under them, that sit on mud. We're not going to
be concerned about possible seismic problems with this building that
sits in mud? We're going to then put seniors and disabled into these
buildings? As
much as Mr. Atwood's vision of an "Urban Core" is inviting, without
viable public transportation, it cannot happen. With the seismic and
geological issues that lurk underground, a subway is all but
impossible, and would be very expensive to build, even more expensive
to maintain, and may prove very dangerous to be riding in if the earth
decides to move. Even
if the subway could be built in a concrete sleeve through the
underground river and/or methane, can you imagine the horror of having
it fall in during a major earthquake? Mr. Atwood wasn't in West
Hollywood when they stopped the subway construction west on Wilshire at
Western, but I was. John Duran was too, but certainly focused
elsewhere. He may not remember that it was decided that going west on
Wilshire was a methane laden nightmare. Once past Highland, it would
turn into a tar nightmare too. If the subway were routed farther north,
then it might possibly go west, until it hits water. It is feasible to
build a subway if they route it north on Western, and then go west on
Melrose or Santa Monica Blvd. If Beverly Hills agrees, this could be
done, but it is very unlikely Beverly Hills would allow a subway under
any of it's treasured streets. I heard mythology that once
Beverly Hills did consider burying the portion of Santa Monica Blvd.
that went through it, but the idea was scrapped because it cost too
much. It cost too much because they sit on the same aquifer, which is
why there is no deep underground parking in Beverly Hills. In fact,
there is no deep underground parking anywhere in the Beverly Hills,
Mid-Wilshire, West Hollywood area. Now you know why. When
I was 12 years old, my father and I went to New York City to get his
birth certificate and name change resolved. We drove our little Corvair
Monza all over the city when we could, but also avoided driving a lot
of times and places. The city was gridlock for a lot of the day.
Without subways, it would be impossible to get around in. I
would ask Mr. Atwood to consider his "Urban Core" that he envisions
without a subway. The only other option is an elevated rapid transit.
Can we start the first leg of it outside his apartment window? Perhaps
the other leadership in the city who think this "Urban Core" is a great
idea can volunteer air space near where they reside as well. LA
once had the finest public transportation system in the country, the
Pacific Electric Red Car. The very capitalism which Mr. Atwood praises,
coupled with a lack of vision by the elected officials of the day,
allowed for the dismantling of the red car line, and it's replacement
by busses. Santa Monica Boulevard was once one of the arterial streets
for the Red Car Line. Now it is constantly clogged with traffic, not
from West Hollywood residents (who usually walk or drive on a "back"
streets like Fountain or Willoughby), but with regional traffic, people
going from Hollywood to Beverly Hills, or Century City. A friend
recently told me it was taking her over 70 minutes each way to get to
her doctor's office in Santa Monica. When the area is built with more
dense taller buildings, how will that number expand? Imagine spending
two hours in gridlocked traffic just to get to the 405. Is that Mr.
Atwood's vision of an "Urban Core?" Before
I left the city, I was having a conversation with one of the high level
staff in the city about additional traffic from the proposed Movietown
Plaza development. Her response was something to the effect of, "well,
it will add to gridlock, but the streets are already gridlocked anyway,
so what difference does it make." So,
you can see that traffic management is a high priority in the city of
West Hollywood. This is the kind of long term vision demonstrated by
current leadership in City Hall. West Hollywood was supposed to be an "Urban VILLAGE" not an "Urban Nightmare." I
have moved to another city that actually did make a decision to grow
"up" over twenty five years ago. The city of Portland Oregon and it's
neighbors, drew an "Urban Growth Boundary" around itself and said that
no urban type development could happen out of that boundary. It went on
to plan and build one of the finest light rail systems in America, the
MAX line. The MAX serves three counties, and is bicycle
friendly. Zoning was modified to encourage development along the
corridors that the MAX serves. The city is resplendent with mixed use
developments, particularly along the MAX. This is a city where one can
actually live without a car, which is why lots of creative young people
(who are usually of moderate means) are flocking to it. Portland
has made solid plans to grow "up", and it is doing it with fewer
"variances" from it's planning and zoning laws. Even so, there are
seismic and geological issues here, and pressures from developers as
well. But the city has a long history of healthy dissent, and
leadership actually listens to residents and acts accordingly. West Hollywood is just adding density, to an already overly dense area, the most dense west of Manhattan. Is
it any wonder why traffic is turning to gridlock? It's being created by
short sighted elected officials, who in concert with developer
"friends" are destroying what's left of the city. If the current trend
is not altered, the city will be a lot like Westwood "Village" within
ten years. Is that were Mr. Atwood wants to live? If so, he should just
move there now. It's ironic that West Hollywood is losing it's
creativity to a place like Portland, which actually is making policy
which encourages creative young people to live here. What I've found
here is a plethora of "hip" places to eat, drink, hear the latest
"indy" music, young talent, and genuine "green" planning. It's a city
that works, and respects people who work. It may not be perfect, but
it's not being driven by less than a handful of people who refuse to
listen to anyone else. So, I would encourage Mr. Atwood to come
take a look at Portland. He's welcome to stay at my place, ten feet
from the Columbia River. He will pass through the number one airport in
the country (recently rated among readers of Conde Nast Traveler) and
will be able to walk, read, bike, shop and eat out in one of the finest
cities in America. He will find the air exceptionally clean, the water
even cleaner (so pure they don't have to put chlorine in it), and he
will find well read, intelligent people here, who understand that it
takes more than mixed use condos to make a city great. It
takes "soul", something only economic diversity and healthy dissent can
bring. Healthy dissent is very absent from the political scene in West
Hollywood, and all of the new development is erasing economic diversity
as well. From the banks of the mighty Columbia River, Ed Garren If
there can be such a thing as instinctual memory, the consciousness of
land and water must lie deeper in the core of us than any knowledge of
our fellow beings. We were bred of the earth before we were born of our
mothers. Once born we can live without our mothers, or fathers, or any
other kin, or any friend, or human love. We cannot live without the
earth or apart from it, and something is shriveled in man’s heart when
he turns away from it and concerns himself only with the affairs of men. Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings from “Cross Creek” Edward
"Ed" Garren, MFT is a Family Therapist, justice activist, former West
Hollywood City Council candidate, writer and sojourner. He is
originally from the Tampa Bay area of central Florida. Ed has been
published in the Los Angeles Times, Frontiers news magazine, and other
books, including "Out of My Mind", a pictorial memoir by Kris Nelson.
He is currently working on a book about Addiction in America. More
information about Ed can be found at: www.edgarren.us 
Ed Garren near Susanville, CA.
Click Here To E Mail Questions – please support our community-based sponsors as they do us - COMMERCIAL SPONSOR 
West Hollywood photographer and urban thinker Tom Atwood. 
COMMERCIAL SPONSOR – please support our community-based sponsors as they do us - COMMERCIAL SPONSOR 
West
Hollywood has nowhere near the amount of rainfall that Florida enjoys,
and as a consequence experiences flooding when rainfall occurs. Photo
by Ryan Gierach. 
COMMERCIAL SPONSOR - Visit “The Other Side” on Friday Nights to hear James Lent - COMMERCIAL SPONSOR 
The
line of high rise buildings seen from this West Hollywood hillside all
rest along Wilshire Boulevard where methane and high water levels force
above ground parking. Photo by Ryan Gierach. 
YOU CAN EFFECT CHANGE – WRITE AN OPINION PIECE SUPPORTING YOUR POV – WEHONEWS PUBLISHES EVERYTHING SUBMITTED! 
A WeHo parking lot filled by rainfall. Photo by Ryan Gierach. 
COMMERCIAL SPONSOR – please support our community-based sponsors as they do us - COMMERCIAL SPONSOR 
West Hollywood’s Plummer Park gym after a rain. Photo by Ryan Gierach. 
COMMERCIAL SPONSOR – please support our community-based sponsors as they do us - COMMERCIAL SPONSOR 
This new mixed us development at Hancock and Santa Monica Boulevard can go down only so far for parking. Photo by Ryan Gierach. 
Advertise With WeHoNews - Reach 60,000 pairs of eyes each month while supporting WeHo’s ONLY COMMUNITY ONLINE NEWSPAPER 
Building
high rise buildings along the Sunset Strip, like these, also risks
seismic activity. The hillsides are often run through with faults that
could cause landslide. Photo by Ryan Gierach. 
Advertise With WeHoNews - Reach 60,000 pairs of eyes each month while supporting WeHo’s ONLY COMMUNITY ONLINE NEWSPAPER 
Another view of the famed Sunset Strip and its towers. Photo by Ryan Gierach. 
ADVERTISEMENT – please support our gracious community-based sponsors - ADVERTISEMENT 
Although
ten stories at La Cienega and Santa Monica could be built, its effect
on already nettlesome area traffic issues could make it impossible.
Photo by Ryan Gierach. 
COMMERCIAL SPONSOR – please support our community-based sponsors as they do us - COMMERCIAL SPONSOR 
The view from Ed Garren’s place in Hayden Island, OR. 

Advertise With WeHoNews - Reach Over 60,000 pairs of eyes each month while supporting WeHo’s ONLY COMMUNITY ONLINE NEWSPAPER